CHBRP’s 60-day timeline of the analytic process
CHBRP’s authorizing statute requires that CHBRP provide the Legislature with its analysis within 60 days of having received a request from the referring committee. To meet this deadline, a timeline was developed to coordinate the various analytical processes. Below is an abbreviated version of the CHBRP 60-day timeline that describes in broad terms the steps taken to produce a report.
1-9
-
Receive & post request to website
-
Schedule weekly conference call for analytic team
-
Check re recusals
-
Identify bill language or interpretation ambiguity
-
Draft Bill Specific Coverage Survey due
-
Identify relevant diseases/services, health outcomes
-
Identify potential content experts
-
Initial literature search specifications due
-
Initial literature search specifications due
-
Review draft Bill-Specific Coverage Survey
-
Review draft Bill-Specific Coverage Survey
-
Initial literature search specifications due
10-19
-
Clarify intent with bill author
-
Finalize interpretation of bill language
-
With analytic team leads, finalize scope of analysis
-
Finalize and transmit Bill-Specific Survey
-
Screen content expert per protocol and schedule call with team
-
Request information/confirmation from Public Programs
-
Finalize list of relevant diseases/conditions, treatments/services, and health outcomes
-
Review abstract database and finalize analytic approach
-
Draft tables summarizing effectiveness literature
-
Review abstract database and finalize analytic approach
-
Identify relevant diseases/conditions, treatments/services/procedures for actuaries to pull baseline utilization and cost from claims database
-
Review draft Table 1, draft cost model, medical effectiveness literature analysis, and evidence from the literature to identify: Per-unit cost; impact projection assumptions (utilization, cost offsets, long-term impacts, relevant CEA literature); bill specific assumptions
-
Provide per-unit cost (if available from claims databases)
-
Draft Table 1 due
-
1 draft cost model due (baselines and suggested formats for Tables 1, X, and Y)
-
Review abstract database and finalize analytic approach
-
Compile baseline prevalence, incidence, and disparities information
-
Review 1 draft cost model
-
PH specific requests for actuaries due
-
Initial abstract database due
20-34
-
Blind and post responses to Bill-Specific Surveys
-
Post responses from Public Programs
-
Compile public demand info
-
1 draft of Policy Context section & appendices due
-
Review other sections
-
Assemble draft report for reviews
-
1 draft ME section & appendices
-
Review other draft sections
-
1 draft Cost section & appendices
-
Review other draft sections
-
Compile responses to Bill-Specific Survey and responses from Public Programs
-
2 draft cost model due (baselines and impacts)
-
H team data runs due
-
Review draft Cost section
-
Provide evidence for impacts on subpopulations
-
1 draft Background, PH section & appendices
-
Review other draft sections
-
Any revised/additional abstract databases shared
35-44
-
Teams revise draft based on reviewer feedback
45-54
- External review by National Advisory Council, Content Expert, CHBRP Task Force Faculty member, and editor
- Teams revise draft based on reviewer feedback
55-59
- Final editor review and proof
- All teams finalize report sections
60
- CHBRP staff finalize report, transmit to the legislature, and post it on the website